Dear fellow listowners:
 
Does someone have any idea what happened here.  I send a "set digest"
command when mail to one of our subscribers started bouncing. This is
the message I received from listserv:
 
    #3166       19-SEP-1996 12:23:29.29
From:SMTP%"[log in to unmask]"
To:  FACSHAFERI
CC:
Subj:Output of your job "FACSHAFERI"
 
Date:         Thu, 19 Sep 1996 13:23:07 -0400
From:         "L-Soft list server at TEMPLEVM (1.8b)" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:      Output of your job "FACSHAFERI"
To:           "Ingrid H. Shafer" <[log in to unmask]>
 
> quiet set vatican2 digest for bgorman@*
Invalid subscription option - "FOR". No action taken.
 
Summary of resource utilization
-------------------------------
 CPU time:        0.003 sec                Device I/O:        0
 Overhead CPU:    0.002 sec                Paging I/O:        0
 CPU model:        3090                    DASD model:     3380
 
I then pushed reply and resubmitted precisely the same command.
This time it worked!!!!  I can see absolutely no difference in
the two commands.
 
MAIL>
    #3167       19-SEP-1996 12:28:24.63
From:MERCUR::FACSHAFERI
To:  SMTP%"[log in to unmask]"
CC:  FACSHAFERI
Subj:RE: Output of your job "FACSHAFERI"
 
quiet set vatican2 digest for bgorman@*
 
    #3168       19-SEP-1996 12:28:29.27
From:SMTP%"[log in to unmask]"
To:  FACSHAFERI
CC:
Subj:Output of your job "FACSHAFERI"
 
Date:         Thu, 19 Sep 1996 13:28:07 -0400
From:         "L-Soft list server at TEMPLEVM (1.8b)" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:      Output of your job "FACSHAFERI"
To:           "Ingrid H. Shafer" <[log in to unmask]>
 
> quiet set vatican2 digest for bgorman@*
VATICAN2: subscription options updated for [log in to unmask]
 
One entry updated. No notification has been sent.
 
Summary of resource utilization
-------------------------------
 CPU time:        0.083 sec                Device I/O:       14
 Overhead CPU:    0.030 sec                Paging I/O:        0
 CPU model:        3090                    DASD model:     3380
 
 
I am always troubled by such inconsistencies.  Makes me wonder if there
is a bug somewhere . . . Or am I simply not seeing the obvious? Maybe some
stray character got into my address and Temple listserv didn't recognize
me as listowner????  Puzzled . . .
 
Thanks, Ingrid
[log in to unmask]