|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Thu, 19 Jun 2003 14:50:20 -0400 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Bryan Fritchie wrote:
> Since this appears to be an issue, is there a possibility that future
> versions can specifically have both an Owner and a Co-Owner property? That
> way a Co-Owner could do just about everything except replace the Owner.
> Both Owner and Co-Owner could still allow multiple entries, but then there
> would be a definitive meaning between the different roles.
I don't see a business case for doing this.
I have lists where where I assign "Content Administrators". Their job
requires complete subscriber access, including assigning
editor/moderator ... but I don't want them otherwise mucking with the
list configuration. I'm sure 100 other customers could come up with 100
more scenarios. Any solution I can think of would be way to complex to
build and maintain. I think Chris' suggestion is best. :-)
cheers, wayne
|
|
|