|
Sender: |
|
Date: |
Mon, 28 Sep 1998 23:26:22 -0500 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Content-Type: |
TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII |
In-Reply-To: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Comments: |
|
?On Mon, 28 Sep 1998, Pete Weiss wrote:
> which indicates to me that your explanation is NOT lame.
>
> As a matter of fact, I see this almost every day on one of the lists that
> I operate.
Of course it isn't lame, happens all the time. That is why when I am
on "errors duty" I do it only once a day per list. If I know there were
50 postings distributed that day, and subscriber A has only two
"userunknown" errors I consider them "del & ignore" errors, a waste
of my time as I'm not going to do anything because there is not reason
to do anything. That's why I like to do the errors only once per day,
so I can get a perspective of what is going on. Douglas
|
|
|