|
Sender: |
|
Date: |
Tue, 28 Nov 2006 09:40:00 -0400 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed |
From: |
|
Liam:
I'am using the CONTENT_FILTER, and it does exactly what I want.
Thanks very much!
------------------
Liam Kelly wrote:
>>Yes, but why not drop it as soon as it's determined to be spam?
>>
>>By sending it on instead of dropping it, all you're doing is wasting bandwidth and cycles.
>>
>>
>
>Not necessarily. If you were using the CONTENT_FILTER, you could set the
>action for messages flagged as spam to MODERATE rather than DISCARD. If
>you didn't trust your AV system enough to let it delete your mail for you
>(and I certainly don't trust mine that much yet), it could make a lot of
>sense to flag the message but send it on to LISTSERV anyway.
>
>Would you let SpamAssassin delete LSTSRV-L mail before you saw it? ;)
>
>
>
|
|
|