|
Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Mon, 20 Mar 2006 15:30:06 -0500 |
In-Reply-To: |
Your message of "Mon, 20 Mar 2006 16:25:23 -0400."
<000f01c64c5c$6aaa0f70$180da8c0@Encrypted> |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
Reply-To: |
|
On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 16:25:23 -0400, Bruno Robichaud said:
> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; Boundary="123456789123456789abcd"
>
> --123456789123456789abcd
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
> ' + @BodyTEXT + '
>
> --123456789123456789abcd
> Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
> ' + @BodyHTML + '
>
> --123456789123456789abcd
> Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
> ' + @BodyAOL + '
Gaak. Two *different* text/html bodyparts in a multipart/alternative?
Pray tell, how does the MUA choose which one to display? And is there a
problem with using *one* text/html that's actually standards-compliant
rather than standards-complacent? ;)
|
|
|