|
Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Sender: |
|
Date: |
Wed, 10 Sep 1997 15:37:09 -0400 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_1401611944P"; micalg=pgp-md5;
protocol="application/pgp-signature" |
Comments: |
|
On Wed, 10 Sep 1997 14:22:29 CDT, you said:
> Instead of monkeying around with the From address, why not just set the
> Reply-To in your list header to the Generic address?
>
> * Reply-To: address@fqdn
Because I can guarantee that some pencil-neck weenie who desperately
needs to be swatted reppeatedly with a clue-by-four will *still*
override that and send directly to the poster, who's name appears in
the From:
At least here, we have a *big* problem with users, who once you e-mail
them about ONE THING, will then mail you directly about EVERYTHING,
even if it's not your job and they should go through our support
channels instead.
--
Valdis Kletnieks
Computer Systems Senior Engineer
Virginia Tech
|
|
|