|
Sender: |
Revised LISTSERV forum <LSTSRV-L@CEARN> |
Subject: |
|
From: |
Gary Sponseller <SPONSELL@AKRONVM> |
Date: |
Wed, 6 Dec 89 09:42:45 ETZ |
In-Reply-To: |
Message of Tue, 5 Dec 89 18:07:45 EST from <HARRY@MARIST> |
Reply-To: |
Revised LISTSERV forum <LSTSRV-L@CEARN> |
On Tue, 5 Dec 89 18:07:45 EST A. Harry Williams said:
>First we had the CHRISTMA EXEC, and now we have the DIR EXEC. Both
>have had a negative impact on the network. Fortunately, both have not
>been as serious as they had the potential. In both cases, explosive
>propagation has been done via NAMES files, but I know of no case in either
>where one of those NAMES files caused distribution over a major Listserv
>List. However, it is only a matter of time. ...
Don't believe it didn't happen Harry... I recall getting a few transferred
files to me as LSV postmaster since nearly all my lists are set to Files= No
or (Files=Yes and Formcheck= Yes). CHRISTMA EXEC was one of those files.
These lists are L-VMCTR and IBM-MAIN; they are large and/or peered.
After all, I have NAMES file entries for quite a few lists to separate
incoming/outgoing mail into "list NOTEBOOK A" files. So, the possibility
that a list was "infected" by a CHRISTMA EXEC seems quite high given these
past events. Luckily, lists were monitored, shutdown or changed to Files= No
back then (it just didn't get out of hand).
>Harry
Gary
|
|
|