|
Sender: |
The Revised LISTSERV Distribution List <LSTSRV-L@EB0UB011> |
Subject: |
|
From: |
"David Boyes (Network Postmaster)" <556@OREGON1> |
Date: |
Wed, 05 Aug 87 11:10:13 PST |
In-Reply-To: |
Message of Wed, 5 Aug 1987 08:35 BST from <ET@UKACRL> |
Comments: |
Warning -- RSCS tag indicates an origin of RSCSKING@UKACRL |
Reply-To: |
The Revised LISTSERV Distribution List <LSTSRV-L@EB0UB011> |
After watching all this sound and fury pass by, I think I finally have
something to say. As far as I can see, LISTSERV does the best it can,
considering the large numbers of RFC822-deviant mailers out there. Quite
frankly, I *like* the way it works -- it seems sensible to point Sender: at
LISTSERV because IT is doing the redistribution.
I know, I know, sense does not a standard make. But, the rule I was taught was
to "be stringent in what you send out and liberal in what you will accept". I
think that LISTSERV does a terrific job of conforming to the de facto
conventions already in place on the various nets, and a pretty passable job of
complying with RFC822 as well (within the limitations of RSCS & the Crosswell
MAILER software). Errors-To: is a commonly used keyword, and it seems to me
that the address there is the logical place to send errors, eg, bounced
mail,etc.
At any rate, I guess the point is that Eric's stuff conforms to what *is*, not
what the standards say. My vote goes for leaving it that way.
----------
David Boyes (503) 686-4394 |BITNET: 556@OREGON1
Systems Group |ARPA : 556%OREGON1.BITNET@
University of Oregon Computing Center| WISCVM.WISC.EDU
UUCP: [your fav backbone]...!tektronix!uoregon!oregon2!oregon1!556
|
|
|