LSTSRV-L Archives

LISTSERV Site Administrators' Forum

LSTSRV-L

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Parts/Attachments: text/plain (18 lines)
Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
LISTSERV site administrators' forum <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Pete Weiss <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 10 May 2004 14:10:02 -0400
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask] corp.net>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Reply-To:
LISTSERV site administrators' forum <[log in to unmask]>
At 13:49 05/10/2004 Monday, Hiler, John wrote:
 >I spoke with a FOLUSA rep last week, who indicated that as many as
 >threemessages were sent to FOLUSA-L list but never made the distribution.
 >I checkedthe archives to find two of them in the archives. Another
 >message, sent Monday, did make the distribution, but not the archives. Is
 >there any way to audit listserv to determine what messages it has
 >received, distributed and archived? This problem has been persistent
 >enough to warrant investigation of alternative MLM tools for FOLUSA (and
 >maybe the INFOTRAC2000 list as well).

As far as I can tell from reading a decade's worth of Daily Error Monitor
logs, email delivery is not 100% reliable.  And in the past year, it is
growing more and more less reliable due to spam and viruses.

This is not a LISTSERV problem per se.

/Pete

ATOM RSS1 RSS2