|
Sender: |
|
Date: |
Thu, 2 Jan 1997 22:57:41 EST |
Reply-To: |
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7BIT |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Organization: |
Marist College |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
On Thu, 2 Jan 1997 17:50:07 EST Roger Fajman said:
>Here's a suggestion for a future version of LISTSERV, perhaps the one
>following 1.8b:
>
>We have our local service area defined to be our own organization and
>have many lists that use Service=Local. We also have a lesser, but
>still significant, number of lists that are intended to serve our
>parent organization and all its components. Right now, if those lists
>are not to be visible to the whole Internet, each one must specify the
>proper service area individually. This is awkward when the definition
>of that service area changes. What I would like to be able to do is
>define additional service areas that could be referenced by lists. One
>way of doing that would be to allow Service=(xyz-l), meaning "the same
>service area as list xyz-l."
Couldn't you do this with ".ik"?
/ahw
|
|
|