 
|
| Mime-Version: |
1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.3) |
| Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252; delsp=yes; format=flowed |
| Date: |
Mon, 20 Mar 2006 09:47:47 -0500 |
| Reply-To: |
|
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| In-Reply-To: |
<001101c64c2a$da856330$180da8c0@Encrypted> |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
quoted-printable |
| Sender: |
|
On Mar 20, 2006, at 9:30 AM — 3/20/06, Bruno Robichaud wrote:
> Thx for the tips, About the Mail transport agent right now we using
> the IIS
> SMTP, which other SMTP would be more efficient than this one. Iss
> there a
> perfect match? I know the LSMTP was made to run with Listserv but
> is there
> other good one out there that would be good too at good price or even
> "Free"?
I have no idea what IIS SMTP is, but if your LISTSERV runs in a Unix
or Linux environment, then sendmail is very popular. Qmail works well
too. Both are free, but both take a good deal of effort to install
and configure.
If I had the choice here at my site, I would migrate my LISTSERV to
Windows and run LSMTP. Unfortunately, that choice is not mine to make.
As an aside, if I was in charge @ L-Soft, I would get L-Soft to
produce a Linux version of LSMTP so I could run both LSMTP and
LISTSERV on Linux. If your LISTSERV operates on VMS or Windows, there
are a lot of good things to be said about going with LSMTP in a high
volume environment, even though its not a free solution.
|
|
|
