I had complained earlier about the LISTS database at TCSVM not
recognizing the deletion of the ARPABBS list at RPICICGE.  I was sent
regular "warnings" about problems with the list-id consistency.
        Response: update was probably lost in a cold start or otherwise
lost, don't worry.  Several refresh commands were sent.  Even if that
didn't work the monthly checksum would take care or the problem.
        It has now been about three months since the list was deleted
and the "warnings" are still coming.  I have checked the LISTS database
at several sites, including all peers for the list.  The only node which
still believes in ARPABBS@RPICICGE is TCSVM, several others have duplicate
entries for the other peers, but only TCSVM shows the RPICICGE entry.
        Suggestions?  Thanks for your help.
 
 
Michael
 
 
 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Mon, 5 Sep 1988 16:02 CDT
From: Revised List Processor <LISTSERV@TCSVM>
Subject: Message
To: Michael Smith <MNSMITH@UMAECS>
 
Warning: a  possible inconsistency in  the network-wide "List-ID"  of list
ARPABBS has  been detected. Please ensure  that it does correspond  to the
peered chain: ARPABBS@FINHUTC ARPABBS@RPICICGE ARPABBS@TCSVM [log in to unmask]