 
|
| Sender: |
|
| Date: |
Mon, 20 Mar 2006 12:37:07 -0700 |
| Content-Disposition: |
inline |
| Reply-To: |
|
| Subject: |
|
| MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
quoted-printable |
| In-Reply-To: |
|
| Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed |
| From: |
|
--On March 20, 2006 9:47:47 AM -0500 Stan Horwitz <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> On Mar 20, 2006, at 9:30 AM — 3/20/06, Bruno Robichaud wrote:
>
>> Thx for the tips, About the Mail transport agent right now we using
>> the IIS
>> SMTP, which other SMTP would be more efficient than this one. Iss
>> there a
>> perfect match? I know the LSMTP was made to run with Listserv but
>> is there
>> other good one out there that would be good too at good price or even
>> "Free"?
>
> I have no idea what IIS SMTP is, but if your LISTSERV runs in a Unix or
> Linux environment, then sendmail is very popular. Qmail works well too.
> Both are free, but both take a good deal of effort to install and
> configure.
He means Microsoft Internet Information Server's SMTP ... .. thing. :)
|
|
|
