LSTSRV-L Archives

LISTSERV Site Administrators' Forum

LSTSRV-L

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Parts/Attachments: text/plain (17 lines)
Print Reply
Sender:
The Revised LISTSERV Distribution List <LSTSRV-L@EB0UB011>
Subject:
X-To:
Eric Thomas <ERIC@FRECP11>, <LSTSRV-L@EB0UB011>
Date:
Tue, 11 Nov 1986 15:51:56 GMT
From:
"Postmaster (Niall O'Reilly)" <EARNUCD@IRLEARN>
Reply-To:
The Revised LISTSERV Distribution List <LSTSRV-L@EB0UB011>
Revised LISTSERV does not recognise that "Resent-Reply-To" should
over-ride "Reply-To".  This is disastrous for a list which is set up to
"respect" the "Reply-To" field.
 
Today I forwarded a message received from the MAILBOOK distribution list
to colleagues, using a local list.  I gave the command "REPLYTO SELF" to
avoid their comments going to the original list, and verified that MAIL
inserted a "Resent-Reply-To" field.  One copy was bounced to me as
postmaster, on account of a mis-spelt userid, and I noticed that the
"Reply-To" field pointed to the ORIGINAL LIST.
 
Bad enough that replies should go to the entire local list, but the
replies will now go to MAILBOOK@DEARN, as few enough people bother to
look at the header of an outgoing message.
 
Niall

ATOM RSS1 RSS2