 
|
| Sender: |
The Revised LISTSERV Distribution List <LSTSRV-L@EB0UB011> |
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
"David Boyes (Network Postmaster)" <556@OREGON1> |
| Date: |
Mon, 07 Sep 87 13:52:25 PST |
| In-Reply-To: |
Message of Thu, 3 Sep 1987 21:04 GVA from <ERIC@CEARN> |
| Reply-To: |
The Revised LISTSERV Distribution List <LSTSRV-L@EB0UB011> |
My vote goes to both sender and receiver, especially if RSCS V2 gets involved
somewhere. What if the receiver gets a corrupted file c/o some friendly RSCS
V2 site somewhere? That could cause some real problems.
The point about one side being a server is well taken, though. Perhaps you
could include a variable containing a list of userid@node combinations that
should never receive 'fail' mail that includes most of the major known file
servers. I think that we could probably get most of the info it would need
from Chris Condon's BITNET SERVERS file.
Ideas? Comments?
----------
David Boyes (503) 686-4394 |BITNET: 556@OREGON1
Systems Group |ARPA : 556%OREGON1.BITNET@
University of Oregon Computing Center| WISCVM.WISC.EDU
UUCP: [your fav backbone]...!tektronix!uoregon!oregon2!oregon1!556
|
|
|
