|
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Mon, 24 Feb 1992 13:12:59 CST |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Reply-To: |
|
On Fri, 21 Feb 1992 15:29:19 EST Ratilal Haria said:
>Mark Wilson ([log in to unmask]) suggested using LOOPCHECK=NONE
>setting on each list that you control. Since I have only a few lists
>I control it will do.
That's not quite what I said. The exact quote was as follows:
>You can change the setting of LOOPCHECK for a particular list, if it's
>just one or a few, at the probable cost of an undetected loop later
>(which of course will just irritate those same "big wheels"). If the
>wheels use several lists, or any you don't control, then I guess you
>have to ask Microsoft (or some Microsoft Mail discussion list) how to
>disable this feature (or at least make it default off).
I was thinking more along the lines of LoopCheck= NOBODY, but even that
leaves you open to a "probable ... undetected loop later". I do _NOT_
recommend LoopCheck= None under any but the most extreme circumstances
(and even then I wouldn't want to be one of the subscribers or owners).
Mark R. Williamson, Rice U., Houston TX; [log in to unmask] or @RICEVM1
|
|
|