What on earth is the import of this rather boring and vaguely
threatening line of questioning? Could it be carried on
offline' please?
> if your board members are committed to l-soft then they shouldn't
> have any problem identifying themselves. they also shouldn't feel
> obliged to publish their addresses.
>
> more fundamentally: is l-soft privately held, and is l-soft planning to
> remain privately held? what role does your board of directors play?