LSTSRV-L Archives

LISTSERV Site Administrators' Forum

LSTSRV-L

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Parts/Attachments: text/plain (19 lines)
Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
LISTSERV site administrators' forum <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Nathan Brindle <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 16 Aug 2006 09:38:37 -0400
In-Reply-To:
<OF71AEFA40.40F5CF8F-ON852571CC.0046D35B-852571CC.00480169@ e1b.org>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Reply-To:
LISTSERV site administrators' forum <[log in to unmask]>
At 09:05 AM 8/16/2006 -0400, Bill Brown wrote:
>I was trying for a more generic test.

Just to revise and extend my remarks...I think it is a mistake to 
overload the subject-tag feature in the way you suggested.  Since 
there's no ironclad guarantee that a subject line beginning with 
"[something]" is always list mail, you really can't predicate OOO 
behavior on it.

If you're not doing the evaluation on MAIL FROM:, then you should be 
doing it based on something like Precedence:.  (For instance, OOO 
should never be sent back if Precedence: is "junk", either.)  It 
could be some other header, of course, but this one is available for 
any MUA author who wants to implement its use.

Anyway...my $0.02.

Nathan

ATOM RSS1 RSS2