Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Sat, 15 Apr 1995 00:08:43 -0700 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
As list owner, I lsvput listname logxxxx, but got back from LISTSERV:
File "listname LOG9501" is unknown to LISTSERV, PUT request rejected.
"listname" of course was substituted with the real name; and there
was no pre-existing LOG9501 on listname. This is LISTSERV 1.8a
So, does Eric's solution (far below) imply that:
1) I shouldn't use LSVPUT (as list owner), or
2) that I must be LISTSERV administrator and PUT the LOGs, or
3) that the list _must_ be name xxxx-L (i.e, _with_ a "-L"), and _cannot_
be named something like xxxxxx (i.e, without the "-L" suffix, which
is the case for the list in question)?
If 1 or 3, then how do I do it?
Peter
- - - - - - -
>From: Eric Thomas <[log in to unmask]>
>Subject: Re: Adding LOGxxxx files
>You can just PUT the logs, *without* defining them in the FILELIST. They
>will be recognized automatically as logs, provided you use the correct
>naming convention (xxxx-L LOGyymm).
|
|
|