|
Sender: |
Revised LISTSERV forum <LSTSRV-L@DEARN> |
Subject: |
|
From: |
Eric Thomas <ERIC@FRECP11> |
Date: |
Sun, 31 Jan 88 10:19:27 SET |
In-Reply-To: |
Your message of Fri, 29 Jan 88 20:55:44 CET |
Reply-To: |
Revised LISTSERV forum <LSTSRV-L@DEARN> |
FLAME ON
I wouldn't put a LISTSERV at DDAGSI1. I would start with putting a RSCSV1
at DDAGSI1 - something that doesn't reject files with a sign-off record
every 30 minutes. DBNGMD21 can remain connected to RSCSV2, and CEARN to
RSCSV1 via the more efficient DMTVMB, and everybody would be happy. I
would also put a line monitor there, so that the line gets restarted
after a severe link error. DDAGSI1 was down over 50% of the time in the
last week (at least, it appeared down in over 50% of the queries I sent).
Once we have a stable link to Germany, we could consider putting a stable
LISTSERV there.
FLAME OFF
Eric
|
|
|