LSTSRV-L Archives

LISTSERV Site Administrators' Forum

LSTSRV-L

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Darin Pesnell <[log in to unmask]>
Mon, 13 Dec 2021 21:50:26 -0500
text/plain (4 kB) , text/html (6 kB)
Thanks for this feedback.  It's frustrating sendgrid is not honoring this.
Does anyone know of an alternative to sendgrid that works well with
listserv?

On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 4:55 PM Nathan Brindle <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> We also have a FAQ for this.
>
> http://lsoft.com/manuals/lsv-faq/416CanMAILFROMonadminmailbechang.html
>
> The blank MAIL FROM is used for administrative messages from LISTSERV that
> should be dropped on the floor rather than returned to sender if they
> bounce for any reason.  The point is to prevent a mailing loop starting up.
>
> Blank MAIL FROM is *not* used for list postings, which have a return path
> of owner-something@NODE, where "something" can be a listname, or a
> listname and a token (i.e., for address probes).
>
> As an anti-spam measure, blocking MAIL FROM:<> is worse than useless
> because it actively blocks legitimate mail that people have requested to
> have sent to them (like command confirmation requests).
>
> Nathan
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: LISTSERV Site Administrators' Forum <[log in to unmask]>
> On Behalf Of Dennis Boone
> Sent: Monday, December 13, 2021 4:09 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Blank Mail From
>
>  > I am installing a fresh 17.x Listserv on RHEL and I have it mostly
>  > working.  One issue though is that it the listserv is not setting the
>  > from address, but instead leaving it blank.  I am trying to use Sendgrid
>  > as my SMTP server and they require this field to map to an approved
>  > domain, which it is not.  Can anyone guide me on how to resolve this?
>
> In my experience, LISTSERV usually just sent bounces that way.  But
> Sendgrid is breaking most of the rules by rejecting such mail.
>
> De
>
>
> RFC2505 (spam prevention), section 2, recommendation 6a:
>
>         MUST NOT refuse "MAIL From: <>".
>
> RFC821 (SMTP), section 3.7:
>
>         One way to prevent loops in error reporting is to specify
>         a null reverse-path in the MAIL command of a notification
>         message.  When such a message is relayed it is permissible
>         to leave the reverse-path null.  A MAIL command with a null
>         reverse-path appears as follows:
>
>         MAIL FROM:<>
>
> RFC2476 (message submission), section 3.2:
>
>         Note that a null return path, that is, MAIL FROM:<>, is
>         permitted and MUST be accepted. (MUAs need to generate null
>         return-path messages for a variety of reasons, including
>         disposition notifications.)
>
> RFC1904 (DSN), section 2:
>
>         The envelope sender address of the DSN SHOULD be chosen to
>         ensure that no delivery status reports will be issued in
>         response to the DSN itself, and MUST be chosen so that DSNs
>         will not generate mail loops.  Whenever an SMTP transaction
>         is used to send a DSN, the MAIL FROM command MUST use a NULL
>         return address, i.e. "MAIL FROM:<>".
>
> RFC1891 (DSN), section 7.1:
>
>         The DSN sender address (in the SMTP MAIL command) MUST be a
>         null reverse-path ("<>"), as required by section 5.3.3 of [9].
>         The DSN recipient address (in the RCPT command) is copied from
>         the MAIL command which accompanied the message for which the
>         DSN is being issued.  When transmitting a DSN via SMTP, the RET
>         parameter MUST NOT be used.  The NOTIFY parameter MAY be used,
>         but its value MUST be NEVER.  The ENVID parameter (with a newly
>         generated envelope-id) and/or ORCPT parameter MAY be used.
>
> RFC1123 (requirements for internet hosts), section 5.2.9:
>
>         The syntax shown in RFC-821 for the MAIL FROM: command omits
>         the case of an empty path:  "MAIL FROM: <>" (see RFC-821
>         Page 15).  An empty reverse path MUST be supported.
>
> ############################
>
> To unsubscribe from the LSTSRV-L list:
> write to: mailto:[log in to unmask]
> or click the following link:
> http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/scripts/wa-PEACH.exe?SUBED1=LSTSRV-L&A=1
>
> ############################
>
> To unsubscribe from the LSTSRV-L list:
> write to: mailto:[log in to unmask]
> or click the following link:
> http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/scripts/wa-PEACH.exe?SUBED1=LSTSRV-L&A=1
>

############################

To unsubscribe from the LSTSRV-L list:
write to: mailto:[log in to unmask]
or click the following link:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/scripts/wa-PEACH.exe?SUBED1=LSTSRV-L&A=1


ATOM RSS1 RSS2