Fri, 4 Sep 1992 10:56:18 CST
|
From: Cristina Blanxer <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: My experiences with LISTEARN
Comments: To: Darren Evans-Young <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To: Message of Thu,
3 Sep 1992 17:11:15 CDT from <[log in to unmask]>
On Thu, 3 Sep 1992 17:11:15 CDT you said:
>
>Harry,
>
>You are not alone. I went through HELL trying to remove my IBM-MAIN
>peer. I was never personally advised that EB0UB011 was going away.
>I just happened to get wind of it through RELAY-L. It took me hours
| Right, Darren. As the node is going to fade away, the server RELAY
|was been shut down.
| Let me tell you that you work stupidly more than you needed. It shows
|that you don't have much work to do otherwise, you would have thougt
|f a way of getting in contact with the postmaster of listserv, who
|s SERVEMAN@EB0UB011, where i got nothing from you.
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<DELETED TEXT>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
|I hope I don't have never more to work together, because it's a real
|pain in the ***.
| Sincerely yours:
| Cristina Blanxer (postmaster of LISTSERV@EB0UB011,
postmaster of LISTSERV@EBCESCA1)
I find this a little disturbing, is this the expected reply or attitude
that I am going to get from the postmaster when a problem arises. While I may
not be entirely versed in the subject or the particular matter at hand I am
concerned with the attitude of those I am likely to be working with at some
future date. I work with a server and am still learning the ins and outs
and it is likely that i will have to call upon the Postmaster from time to
time, and I do not like being told that being a bit netter makes me a pain
in the ****. I would have expected a more professional attitude from a
postmaster, perhaps I have expected too much from one that is obiouslly not
a *BITNET* netter.
C.W. Turner
GT2150@SIUCVMB (BITNET)
[log in to unmask] (INTNET)
[log in to unmask] (INTNET)
[log in to unmask] (FREENET)
|
|
|