|
Sender: |
|
Date: |
Thu, 26 Oct 2000 14:56:53 -0500 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
From: |
|
What I was trying to avoid: People move on, and need to unsubscribe.
People using the sublist would have to unsubscribe from two lists. They
forget about one...usually ours...and the subscriber list gets bloated.
I could add them to SEND=, on a persona by persona basis...but I know there
would be cases where they'd disappear and I wouldn't notice. If there were
a *generic* address for SEND, I could use that and not have to worry about
people transferring in and out of the sublist. But...no wildcards means no
generic addresses are possible.
SEND= isn't a necessity, and not the simplest solution. Renew cuts out old,
dead addresses...those dead for other reasons, too.
Barb in Southern Indiana Zone 5/6 [log in to unmask]
A root is a flower that disdains fame.
> Though I'm a little confused by the original question, since sub-lists
> are involved, perhaps a sub-list could be altered so that it has a
>
> SERVICE= *@*.university.edu, *@university.edu
>
> and then the main-list
>
> SEND= SEND = [log in to unmask], (sub-listname), (listname)
>
|
|
|