LSTOWN-L Archives

LISTSERV List Owners' Forum

LSTOWN-L

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Parts/Attachments: text/plain (12 lines)
Print Reply
Sender:
LISTSERV list owners' forum <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Natalie Maynor <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 23 Jan 1996 10:40:02 -0600
Reply-To:
LISTSERV list owners' forum <[log in to unmask]>
> Is anyone else bothered by the increasingly widespread habit of referring
> to a list as a "listserv?"
 
YES!  As a descriptive linguist, I know that language change is not "bad,"
that languages reshape themselves to meet the changing needs of the speakers,
and that I should not feel as annoyed as I do when I hear "listserv" for
"list."  But I can't help it.  It drives me crazy, partially for the
reasons you've mentioned:  the confusion it can lead to when net newbies
think that "send this command to the listserv" means "send this command to
the list."
   --Natalie ([log in to unmask])

ATOM RSS1 RSS2