 
|
| Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
| Sender: |
|
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| Date: |
Tue, 29 May 2001 18:51:04 -0400 |
| In-Reply-To: |
|
| Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" |
| Reply-To: |
|
At 11:35 AM -0400 05/28/01, Jim Walker wrote (SNIP):
>My post was to try to get LSOFT to feel our pain and change language=NOHTML
>to respect list owners intent.
Surely any list-owner (LITE or classic) can establish a rule barring
html and can enforce it by removing violators. And list-owners
(classic) can easily reconfigure their own list headers to include
language= NOHTML.
At 9:00 AM -0400 05/29/01, Russ Hunt wrote (SNIP)::
>I'd suggest that this is Micro$oft's problem, not LISTSERV's. (Yes,
>I understand that there's
>a risk for users of IE 5.5, but I don't see why this is particularly
>relevant to LISTSERV.)
Perhaps not to LISTSERV per se, but since a lot of people use IE
5.5, it seems relevant to the security of lot of listserv users.
___________________
Jane-Kerin Moffat
<[log in to unmask]>
|
|
|
