> Explicit gateways are  not a good idea, generally  speaking, because they
> don't let the users send  commands to the server. [log in to unmask] may
> not be the same as [log in to unmask] - it could be [log in to unmask], or
> [log in to unmask], or [log in to unmask]  at the local site,  etc. The problem
> is that internet mail from SUVM doesn't  work any more; this is a serious
> problem, and it  should be fixed, not bypassed through  another box which
> happens to use different routing.
 
Correction noted.  I just mean IF ALL ELSE FAILS, I'd use an
explicit route rather than creating a gatewayed subgroup to solve
that particular problem.
 
Joe
>
>   Eric