|
Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Mon, 21 Aug 2000 08:38:25 -0400 |
In-Reply-To: |
<399FDA1D.4266.78F3F@localhost> |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
Reply-To: |
|
>Since autoresponders respond to listserv notifications too..I usually do
>these QUIET .. I do set NOMAIL and NOPOST . but only because that
>way if someone asks later, why they aren't getting list mail, I can tell if
>they had set themselves NOMAIL .. or I did since I only set errors to
>NOMAIL and NOPOST. Easier for me than keeping a list or going
>through change log ;-)
Since we don't usually "just" set anyone to NOPOST (but we do otherwise have REVIEW by default), then the subscriber options of:
NOMAIL and NOPOST
or
MAIL and NOPOST (usually the result of subscriber trying to reset themselves)
are our implicit indicators of the bouncing or vacation-style reasons for these settings.
By NOT using QUIET, the co-owners are also auto-informed of each others actions.
And of course, YMMV
/Pete
|
|
|