Wed, 8 Sep 2004 13:41:28 -0500
|
Many of the list subscribers did not get the message posted to
[log in to unmask] Below is screen shot of error message. I am
not sure what caused the error message.
> Error-For: [log in to unmask]
> Error-Code: 0
> Error-Text: 552 5.5.3 Too many recipients
>
> Error-End: 124 error(s) reported
>
> ----------------------------- Undelivered
message -----------------------------
> Received: from LISTSERV.BSU.EDU by LISTSERV.BSU.EDU (LISTSERV-TCP/IP
release
> 1.8e) with spool id 109544 for [log in to unmask];
Tue,
7 Sep
> 2004 15:37:31 -0500
> Received: from 10.192.16.16 by LISTSERV (SMTPL release 1.0i) with
TCP;
Tue, 7
> Sep 2004 15:27:30 -0500
> Received: from ucmail.uc.edu (ucmail.uc.edu [129.137.3.131]) by
portal.bsu.edu
> (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id i87KQYa17140 for
> <[log in to unmask]>; Tue, 7 Sep 2004 15:26:34
-0500
(EST)
> Received: by UCMAIL with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id
<SJ7LZN2S>;
> Tue, 7 Sep 2004 16:23:34 -0400
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
> Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary="----_=_NextPart_000_01C49518.FAAAAE60"
> Message-ID: <886EF25AF8BEF64EB89A820EF84064FF04FEC5EA@UCMAIL4>
> Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2004 16:26:39 -0400
> Reply-To: NAEE Members Only Chat <[log in to unmask]>
> Sender: NAEE Members Only Chat <[log in to unmask]>
> From: "Vredeveld, George (vredevgm)"
<[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: new dialogue for NAEE members -- join us
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Precedence: list
>
> This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not
understand
> this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.
>
> ------_=_NextPart_000_01C49518.FAAAAE60
> Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
> boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C49518.FAAAAE60"
>
>
> ------_=_NextPart_001_01C49518.FAAAAE60
> Content-Type: text/plain
>
> To NAEE members:
>
> We would like to engage in some dialogue with you concerning the
impact
of
> No Child Left Behind legislation. Many of our members have told us
that
> NCLB's focus on reading and math has moved economics down the
priority
> ladder of many schools. At our center, enrollments have dropped, in
spite
> of concentrated efforts to reverse the trend. I asked my colleague,
Doug
> Haskell, to explain how he has responded to a more difficult
environment.
> His comments are attached.
>
> Please consider a response to Doug's comments. We would like to
hear
from
> many of you.
>
> This discussion is limited to members of NAEE. We appreciate your
> membership and look forward to your participation in this
discussion.
|
|
|