Many of the list subscribers did not get the message posted to
[log in to unmask] Below is screen shot of error message. I am
not sure what caused the error message.
 
> Error-For: [log in to unmask]

> Error-Code: 0

> Error-Text: 552 5.5.3 Too many recipients

>

> Error-End: 124 error(s) reported

>

> ----------------------------- Undelivered

message -----------------------------

> Received: from LISTSERV.BSU.EDU by LISTSERV.BSU.EDU (LISTSERV-TCP/IP

release

> 1.8e) with spool id 109544 for [log in to unmask];

Tue,

7 Sep

> 2004 15:37:31 -0500

> Received: from 10.192.16.16 by LISTSERV (SMTPL release 1.0i) with

TCP;

Tue, 7

> Sep 2004 15:27:30 -0500

> Received: from ucmail.uc.edu (ucmail.uc.edu [129.137.3.131]) by

portal.bsu.edu

> (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id i87KQYa17140 for

> <[log in to unmask]>; Tue, 7 Sep 2004 15:26:34

-0500

(EST)

> Received: by UCMAIL with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id

<SJ7LZN2S>;

> Tue, 7 Sep 2004 16:23:34 -0400

> MIME-Version: 1.0

> X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)

> Content-Type: multipart/mixed;

boundary="----_=_NextPart_000_01C49518.FAAAAE60"

> Message-ID: <886EF25AF8BEF64EB89A820EF84064FF04FEC5EA@UCMAIL4>

> Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2004 16:26:39 -0400

> Reply-To: NAEE Members Only Chat <[log in to unmask]>

> Sender: NAEE Members Only Chat <[log in to unmask]>

> From: "Vredeveld, George (vredevgm)"

<[log in to unmask]>

> Subject: new dialogue for NAEE members -- join us

> To: [log in to unmask]

> Precedence: list

>

> This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not

understand

> this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.

>

> ------_=_NextPart_000_01C49518.FAAAAE60

> Content-Type: multipart/alternative;

> boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C49518.FAAAAE60"

>

>

> ------_=_NextPart_001_01C49518.FAAAAE60

> Content-Type: text/plain

>

> To NAEE members:

>

> We would like to engage in some dialogue with you concerning the

impact

of

> No Child Left Behind legislation. Many of our members have told us

that

> NCLB's focus on reading and math has moved economics down the

priority

> ladder of many schools. At our center, enrollments have dropped, in

spite

> of concentrated efforts to reverse the trend. I asked my colleague,

Doug

> Haskell, to explain how he has responded to a more difficult

environment.

> His comments are attached.

>

> Please consider a response to Doug's comments. We would like to

hear

from

> many of you.

>

> This discussion is limited to members of NAEE. We appreciate your

> membership and look forward to your participation in this

discussion.