|
Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Tue, 26 Feb 2002 14:17:49 -0500 |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed |
Reply-To: |
|
Yes:
The first line of text should be a double dash i.e.,
--
followed by the text on a new line. Actually, I don't think it was the
"PLEASE" but the "REMOVE"
/Pete
At 13:45 02/26/2002 Tuesday, John Bevis wrote:
>Is there any way to control the code that decides that a posting is a
>Listserv command and rejects it? I sure don't need people claiming
>Listserv requires them to be impolite.
>
>>From [log in to unmask] Tue Feb 26 13:43:53 2002
>Date: 26 Feb 2002 12:59:39 -0500
>From: Chris Griffin <[log in to unmask]>
>To: [log in to unmask]
>Subject: [Fwd: Rejected posting to [log in to unmask]]
>
>Can we disable the feature that tries to be helpful and rejects your
>postings if they start with "Please". Half of my net-services posts get
>rejected because I am so polite :-)
>
>Chris
>
>-----Forwarded Message-----
>
>> From: L-Soft list server at LISTS.UFL.EDU (1.8d) <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: Chris Griffin <[log in to unmask]>
>> Subject: Rejected posting to [log in to unmask]
>> Date: 26 Feb 2002 12:08:43 -0500
>>
>> Your message is being returned to you unprocessed because it looks
>like a
>> LISTSERV command, rather than material intended for distribution to the
>members
>> of the NET-SERVICES list. Please note that LISTSERV commands must
>ALWAYS be
>> sent to the LISTSERV address; if it was indeed a command you were
>attempting to
>> issue, please send it again to [log in to unmask] for execution.
>Otherwise,
>> please accept our apologies and try to rewrite the message with a
>slightly
>> different wording - for instance, change the first word of the message,
>enclose
>> it in quotation marks, insert a line of dashes at the beginning
>of your
>> message, etc.
>>
>> ------------------------ Rejected message (35 lines)
>--------------------------
>> Return-Path: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Received: from smtp.ufl.edu (sp47en1.nerdc.ufl.edu [128.227.74.47])
>> by spnode30.nerdc.ufl.edu (8.12.1/8.12.1/2.2.3) with ESMTP id
>g1QH8fEx034936
>> for <[log in to unmask]>; Tue, 26 Feb 2002 12:08:41 -0500
>> Received: from vespoli.nerdc.ufl.edu (vespoli.nerdc.ufl.edu
[128.227.212.96])
>> by smtp.ufl.edu (8.12.2/8.12.1/2.3.5) with ESMTP id g1QH8ZEU035384
>> for <[log in to unmask]>; Tue, 26 Feb 2002 12:08:37 -0500
>> Received: from vespoli.nerdc.ufl.edu (vespoli.nerdc.ufl.edu
[128.227.212.96])
>> by vespoli.nerdc.ufl.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g1QH8at19954
>> for <[log in to unmask]>; Tue, 26 Feb 2002 12:08:36 -0500
>> Subject: DNS changes
>> From: Chris Griffin <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Content-Type: text/plain
>> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>> X-Mailer: Evolution/1.0.2
>> Date: 26 Feb 2002 12:08:36 -0500
>> Message-Id: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Mime-Version: 1.0
>> X-Scanned-By: NERDC Open Systems Group
>(http://open-systems.ufl.edu/services/virus-scan/)
>>
>> Please remove:
>>
>> elm-core-rsm.ns.ufl.edu
>> elm-core-5500.ns.ufl.edu
>>
>> from DNS
>>
>> Thanks
End Reply
|
|
|