LSTSRV-L Archives

LISTSERV Site Administrators' Forum

LSTSRV-L

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Parts/Attachments: text/plain (28 lines)
Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
LISTSERV give-and-take forum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 14 Nov 2002 12:09:07 -0500
Reply-To:
LISTSERV give-and-take forum <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Valdis Kletnieks <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:
Your message of "Thu, 14 Nov 2002 10:45:36 EST." <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Comments:
To: "Bramhall, Mark" <[log in to unmask]> To: [log in to unmask]
On Thu, 14 Nov 2002 10:45:36 EST, "Bramhall, Mark" <[log in to unmask]>  said:

> MHBSERVER 192.168.1.5 0 MAIL - +FROM:<> 250 0 27 36 0 SMTP - - - -
> 2002-11-13 00:41:14 209.119.0.109 cherry.ease.lsoft.com SMTPSVC1

> That looks pretty normal, except for the missing From.

Actually, the "missing" From is totally correct and proper.  See RFC821 and
1123.

> It is just giving up after the "hello" sequence. This is causing a
> "non-delivery report" (NDR) and, since the from is no good, it then
> lands in the "bad mail" area.

BZZT! Wrong answer, thank you for playing.

The entire reason that it gets sent with 'MAIL FROM:<>' is so that the
system knows that an NDR should *NOT* be generated or sent if/when there
is a problem.  This is so automated processes don't get into a bounce-message
loop.

If your system is dropping it in the "bad mail" area rather than simply
discarding it as the standards require, your system is misconfigured.
--
                                Valdis Kletnieks
                                Computer Systems Senior Engineer
                                Virginia Tech

ATOM RSS1 RSS2