 
|
| Sender: |
Revised LISTSERV forum <LSTSRV-L@CEARN> |
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
Zvika Bar-Deroma <AER7101@TECHNION> |
| Date: |
Sat, 9 Dec 89 11:33:02 IST |
| In-Reply-To: |
Message of Fri, 8 Dec 89 16:49:31 GMT from <ERIC@LEPICS> |
| Reply-To: |
Revised LISTSERV forum <LSTSRV-L@CEARN> |
Eric,
Thanks for the quick answers.
I still think that the listname and nodename should be part of the list
header. I believe that adding the two keywords: Listname= and Nodename=
would not hurt anyone, even if the information is available otherwise -
this would cause the list header to contain all the information about
the list. I really think that most people would assume that a "print
ALL" would give them all the available information about the issue.
/Zvika
|
|
|
