|
Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Fri, 12 Sep 1997 12:52:51 -0400 |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
Reply-To: |
|
Right question, wrong answer ;-)
ACK NOREPRO is closing the barn door after the cow has escaped. I believe
the appropriate answer would be to update the list definition keyword to be:
* REPLY-TO: SENDER,RESPECT
That way, those users who REPLY (via mail system that understands what
REPLY means) would be generating a response back to the originator of the
posting, and not to the list itself. The originiator could over-ride that
by providing an explicit REPLY-TO: in the original posting.
12:09 9/12/97 -0400, you wrote:
|On 12 Sep 97 at 11:43, Adam wrote:
|
|> I have a small listserv going, and I have been having problems with
|> people not realizing that they are replying to an entire list. I
|> would like so set all of the users to ACK NOREPRO, how would I go
|> about doing this? adam pennington [log in to unmask]
|
| QUIET SET listname ACK NOREPRO FOR *@*
|
| The QUIET keyword is optional.
--
mailto:[log in to unmask] Tel: +1 814 863 1843
31 Shields Bldg; University Park, PA 16802-1202 USA
Powered by: LISTSERV, Eudora, Netscape, mIRC, FreeAgent
|
|
|