First of all, I want to apologize for for my previous mail commenting
Jose's mail....my fingers hit SEND too early...
Anyway, I only wanted to add to the previous mail, that me too, I'd
pay to get (or get the services of) listSERV and not listEARN.
>
>In my opinion if someone doesn't know whether he's on EARN or not he should
>not reply to such a survey. survey
agree.
>>3- When we read the two mails Eric sent to NAD-F about French people answers
>> we decided to remove him from this list and to change it to "send=private"
>> because we DO NOT WANT any polemic on this list. Moreover, Eric is not a
>> french Node ADministrator and we don't afford his nasty comments.
>>
>>We hope that everything is clear now,
>
>Two comments: nothing is clear now, since you have not offered us any copy of
>Eric's supossedly 'nasty' mails, and therefore we have no means to judge how
>nasty they were, and have to ressort to trust (in you or Eric) to decide
>whether you're right; and I don't find it nice to kick off a person from a
>list just because of a mail, even if it were nasty, since this is clearly an
>act of censorship which does only befit an authoritarian structure, not a open
>forum for free interchange and dialog. Finally: ALL NAD lists should be open,
>so that people from other countries can send there if needed (German lists
>are); and I do not like how this affaire has been presented to the network.
>
>When sending this mail, my intention is not to open an argument about this
>topic, but only to show that not everybody implicitly agrees with your
>methods.
>
>>Dominique and Dominique (EARN-France permanent team)
>
> Jose Maria (speaking as a representative of Jose Maria)
I too, must say that the reaction to Eric's "nasty" (maybe they were,
who knows, I haven't read them) notes, is far from the one I'd expect
in an open libral society...
/Zvika
|