Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - COMMUNITY.EMAILOGY.COM
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - LSTSRV-L Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

LSTSRV-L Archives

LISTSERV Site Administrators' Forum

LSTSRV-L

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
LSTSRV-L Home LSTSRV-L Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: Performance comparison EMM/LSMTP
From:
Eric Thomas <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
LISTSERV site administrators' forum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 8 Jul 2005 18:02:56 +0200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (10 lines)
If you have LSMTP, you probably shouldn't turn EMM on. Overall, you might
gain some application CPU cycles (probably not with Classic though), but on
the other hand you would be creating and deleting a lot of individual files,
which would cost system CPU cycles. Windows and Linux have gotten better at
dealing with very large numbers of files, but there is still a cost for
creating these files. Of course, with a modest workload, you probably
wouldn't notice a difference either way.

  Eric

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

COMMUNITY.EMAILOGY.COM CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV