 
|
| Sender: |
Revised LISTSERV forum <LSTSRV-L@DEARN> |
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
Zvika Bar-Deroma <AER7101@TECHNION> |
| Date: |
Sat, 18 Feb 89 10:53:35 IST |
| In-Reply-To: |
Message of Fri, 17 Feb 89 17:36:36 MEZ from <JMBLASCO@DEARN> |
| Reply-To: |
Revised LISTSERV forum <LSTSRV-L@DEARN> |
I think it's a good solution - provided, of course, that Eric thinks it'
acceptable. It lacks, though, in one way - suppose an EARN LISTSERV
postmaster discovers a bug. This bug could, and probably also will,
affect non-EARN LISTSERVs (remember - most LISTSERVs are not in EARN).
Now the EARN postmaster could not warn the others (at least not
"officially") about the problem, and sometimes this can damage.
Still - the solution of "Eric doesn't support; only includes the
"EARN-master" in the updates he ships" is not bad at all...but now
we have to hear Eric's reaction to it.
/Zvika
|
|
|
