|
Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Thu, 14 Oct 1999 07:48:52 -0400 |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" |
Reply-To: |
|
>I've been curious about this for a long time now, but I haven't been
>able to find an authoritative answer yet.
>
>How are subscription options handled in the following scenario:
>
>User is subscribed to list A. List A is a sub-list of list B.
>User is not subscribed to list B directly. Message is posted to
>list B.
>
>In particular, it seems that there is no way for the user to be
>set to REPRO (i.e. receive a copy of their own messages) when they
>post to a super-list where they are not explicitly subscribed.
>Even if the subscriber is set to REPRO on the sub-list (and there
>is only one sub-list in this example) and both lists have the
>Default-Options= REPRO setting, this still does not seem to work.
Correct. The only way for a user to receive a copy of his or her own
messages that are sent to list B is for that user to be subscribed to
list B and set to REPRO. A similar thing is true for ACK/NOACK; if
the user is not subscribed to list B he or she will get an
acknowledgement or not based solely on the "ACK=" setting for List B.
--
Jacob Haller, Technical Support
L-Soft international, Inc
http://www.lsoft.com/
|
|
|