Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - COMMUNITY.EMAILOGY.COM
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - LSTSRV-L Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

LSTSRV-L Archives

LISTSERV Site Administrators' Forum

LSTSRV-L

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
LSTSRV-L Home LSTSRV-L Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Forum View

Use Proportional Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: BSMTP and hdr lines
From:
Alan Crosswell <EACUS@CUVMA>
Reply To:
The Revised LISTSERV Distribution List <LSTSRV-L@DEARN>
Date:
Mon, 7 Dec 87 18:23 EST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines)
>You get three separate BSMTP files, one each for B, C, and D.  But, if
>MAILER knew the topology (like LISTSERV does) it could generate a single
>BSMTP file with RCPT TO: each of B/C/D, and forward the file to 'B'.  It
>then does its local delivery, and forwards on the 'C/D' remainder to C,
>and so forth.  In other words, you could do a LISTSERV 'distribute' using
>BSMTP if you knew how to split the recipients, and where to send the
>packets.
 
"All" you gotta do is muck around with the MAILER PROFILE and generate
a host-specific set of tables rather than the generic ones that are
in use now.  You can list 47 nodes to have the same BSMTP mail server
if you like and MAILER will do the right thing.  Just try and coordinate
that!  Do you really thing it will cut down mail traffic enough to make
it worth the effort?  I'm not saying it won't, just that someone (not me)
will have to come up with something similar to Eric's spanning tree
stuff.
/a
------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

COMMUNITY.EMAILOGY.COM CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV