Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - COMMUNITY.EMAILOGY.COM
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - LSTSRV-L Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

LSTSRV-L Archives

LISTSERV Site Administrators' Forum

LSTSRV-L

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
LSTSRV-L Home LSTSRV-L Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Revised LISTSERV forum <LSTSRV-L@CEARN>
Subject:
Re: get limits and packages
From:
Eric Thomas <ERIC@LEPICS>
Date:
Fri, 26 May 89 22:09:17 GMT
In-Reply-To:
Message of Wed, 29 Mar 89 11:19:28 EST from <GETTES@PUCC>
Reply-To:
Revised LISTSERV forum <LSTSRV-L@CEARN>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (29 lines)
>Suggestion:
>
>  When ordering  a listserv  package, and  in the case  I am  experiencing, a
>series of packages  at once can LISTSERV simply recognize  that when the user
>has requested  to much  data for  a day that  it halt  the retrieval  of that
>package and  go on to the  next command? So, if  a user asks for  10 packages
>each having 200  files and the first  package puts them over  the limit, then
>they will get 9 messages saying they have exceeded the limit instead of 9*200
>-- this will greatly reduce the resource usage of listserv as well.
>
>/mrg
 
With release 1.6a, the retrieval of  a package cannot be interrupted. That is,
the package is treated as a unique file, and the GET quota exit is called only
once - for the first file,  but unfortunately with the arguments corresponding
to that  one file,  not to the  total package. Computing  the total  number of
files and their total  size would not only require a lot of  code and CPU time
(the present implementation being recursive, this information is known only at
the end), it would also require a  change in the parameters passed to the exit
(which now assumes  it's called for 1 file,  ie new number of files =  1 + old
number).
 
However this  does solve the problem  of packages being halted  in the middle.
Either  you  are  allowed  to  order the  whole  package,  including  possible
sub-packages, or you can't order any the files. You will no longer receive one
error message per file, in that case.
 
  Eric

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

COMMUNITY.EMAILOGY.COM CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV