Eric, I have been a listServ user since roughly 1993 and an site manager

since 2006.  I agree with everything in your reasoning with one exception.

People really like creating rules to sort E-Mail based on the subject tag.

IETFHDR would be the perfect solution for this issue except the subject tag

is not included.  I understand that IETF is a standard that does not permit

changes, but it would be helpful if there was another option that was called

something else that allowed the subject tag and all the duplicate E-Mail to

occur.



The issue with several of my lists is that the people on the list discuss

various topics, but occasionally an expert needs to be added to the

discussion.  The problem is that the expert names get dropped.  Thus the

support tickets I am attempting to process.



Given the above to requirements, how should I proceed?  I would really just

like to have a mode where cc's can be turned on for SUBJECTHDR.





-------------------------------------------------

Curtis E. Stevens

Director, Standards & Features Technology

3355 Michelson Dr. #100

Office: 1-1041

Irvine, Ca. 92612

Phone: 949-672-7933

Cell: 949-307-5050

E-Mail: [log in to unmask]



Remember, you may only be blamed for something if you are actually doing

something.





-----Original Message-----

From: LISTSERV site administrators' forum

[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Eric Thomas

Sent: Monday, February 14, 2011 4:26 PM

To: [log in to unmask]

Subject: Re: Including the Cc: in E-Mail



> would you please explain the reasoning behind excluding the additional

> To: and Cc: recipients?



When I wrote LISTSERV in 1986, and I think this is still the case today,

almost every discussion list had "Reply-To= List" and passing on the full

header caused posters to receive a second copy of every response (and

everyone who responded got a second copy of every further message in the

thread). This drove people crazy because this second copy (1) came directly

from Joe Random Subscriber's mail client and as such did not match any of

the From: or subject tag rules you had set up in your mail client for the

list, so it just landed in your main inbox instead of the folder you had set

up for the list, and (2) tended to arrive first as it did not have to

transit through LISTSERV, and as such it trumped the "real" list posting

when it arrived a minute or so later with the same Message-ID:. So instead

of having all the list conversation in the folder you had neatly set up for

this purpose, you got a bunch of mail from people you did not know, in your

main inbox and without any indication that it was from the list. This made

people reluctant to participate actively because of the resulting inbox

chaos. The most popular exploder on BITNET already rewrote headers for this

reason and I decided to do the same.



Not much has changed with respect to this, although the net is so much

faster that it can be a finish line shot between the direct and

redistributed message. Nevertheless, as a subscriber to let's say this list,

I appreciate receiving only one copy that predictably comes from the list

and can be routed to the appropriate folder. There are cases where this is

not the desired behavior, for instance because the purpose of the list

implies that you often must cc: people who are not on the discussion list

and must be included in every reply, and you can use IETFHDR then.



  Eric