|
Sender: |
The Revised LISTSERV Distribution List <LSTSRV-L@EB0UB011> |
Subject: |
|
From: |
"David Boyes (Network Postmaster)" <556@OREGON1> |
Date: |
Fri, 21 Nov 86 15:59:47 PST |
In-Reply-To: |
Your message of Fri, 21 Nov 86 08:50:45 EST |
Reply-To: |
The Revised LISTSERV Distribution List <LSTSRV-L@EB0UB011> |
I disagree -- the more functionality you can put into ONE DVM, the better. It's
fine if you have plenty of resources to throw at a problem, but when one more
DVM means that you can't log on another user, it's wrong, period. I like the ap
proach that Eric has taken in combining both LISTSERV and a distribution server
. It makes it possible for us to support such a thing.
It makes it possible for us to support such a thing.
I vote to leave the DISTRIBUTE code within LISTSERV. This poor 4341-1 just can'
t handle another DVM.
David Boyes
Systems
University of Oregon Computing Center
|
|
|