 
|
| Sender: |
The Revised LISTSERV Distribution List <LSTSRV-L@EB0UB011> |
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
"Richard A. Schafer" <SCHAFER@RICE> |
| Date: |
Tue, 24 Feb 87 09:28:28 CST |
| In-Reply-To: |
Message of Tue, 24 Feb 87 09:19:26 EST from <A024012@RUTVM1> |
| Reply-To: |
The Revised LISTSERV Distribution List <LSTSRV-L@EB0UB011> |
>Bravo! Count me in as in favor of "DELETE at best peer" being the default.
I agree with this as well. When I get a request from someone to delete
him from a peered list, rather than guessing several times which peer
he's assigned to, or using GLOBAL, I re-add him, let my local listserv
tell me where he's being added, then send a delete. DELETE at best peer
makes a LOT of sense.
Richard
|
|
|
