LSTSRV-L Archives

LISTSERV Site Administrators' Forum

LSTSRV-L

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mark_Strawcutter <[log in to unmask]>
Mon, 4 Feb 1991 22:05:00 EST
text/plain (36 lines)
The following has prompted some discussion over on INFO-NETS.  The main topic
has been the To: header.  It is my understanding that this form is only used
"internally" between LISTSERVs (or between LISTSERV's and VM Mailers?).
 
Everything I ever get in from a LISTSERV lists has To: my local address.
My guess is that there's some non-LISTSERV re-distribution going on (but
that should put back "good" To: shouldn't it, unless someone's impersonating
hos LISTSERV does it).  Or, perhaps a LISTEARN in involved and causing
problems :-)
 
Any insight to what's going on would be much appriciated.  BTW - I'm curious
who added the Return-path, I know PMDF will leave it at the top.
 
> Return-path: <[log in to unmask]>
> Received: from ccvax.ucd.ie by ul.ie with PMDF#10158; Tue, 29 Jan 1991 11:12
>GMT
> Received: from IRLEARN.UCD.IE by ccvax.ucd.ie; Tue, 29 Jan 91 00:43 WET
> Received: from UKACRL.BITNET by IRLEARN.UCD.IE (Mailer R2.03B) with BSMTP id
>  6043; Tue, 29 Jan 91 00:40:36 GMT
> Received: from UKACRL by UKACRL.BITNET (Mailer R2.07) with BSMTP id 9943; Tue,
>  29 Jan 91 00:41:48 GMT
> Date: Fri, 25 Jan 91 17:48:02 GMT
> From: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: RE: Standard Modula2
> Sender: Modula2 List <[log in to unmask]>
> To: Multiple recipients of <[log in to unmask]>
> Reply-to: Modula2 List <[log in to unmask]>
> Message-id: <[log in to unmask]>
> X-Envelope-to: reslerd
> Comments: To: [log in to unmask]
----------
Mark J Strawcutter                           BitNet:    MJSTRAW@IUP
Director, Systems and Data Communications    DNS (mx):  [log in to unmask]
Indiana University of Pennsylvania           Phone:     (412) 357-4000
Indiana, PA   15705                          "you can't nail jello to a tree"

ATOM RSS1 RSS2