|
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Tue, 20 Jul 1993 21:26:52 -0400 |
In-Reply-To: |
Your message of Tue, 20 Jul 93 11:53:29 -0700 |
Comments: |
<Parser> W: CC field duplicated. Last occurrence was retained.
<Parser> W: CC field duplicated. Last occurrence was retained. |
Reply-To: |
|
On Tue, 20 Jul 93 11:53:29 -0700 Rusty Wright said:
> Computers are tools, just like a hammer, a needle, a spoon.
> The prime characteristic of any GOOD tool is that it's designed to
> make it easy for the USER to work with.
> So IMHO users should be able to type at their keyboard:
> Please accept my subscription to the Listmanagers magazine
> and the user's commputer should figure out what it means, where to
> send it to, in what format, and what to expect in return.
>Yeah, and I'd like to be able to get in my car and say out loud "take
>me home" and have the car drive me there.
Would be a good idea for the MADD people (Mothers Against Drunk
Drivers) to bug the auto manufacturers with that idea...
>Wake up and smell the flowers; we don't live in a perfect world.
They do smell nice, don't they? :-)
Aside from that, one of the basics of many in the computer world is
to produce improvements. So one of the questions I want to ask
y'all is whether the idea of moving the whole concept of user
interface consistency to the user's side is a good one or not.
And why (not).
Regards.
$$\
|
|
|