|
Sender: |
|
Date: |
Wed, 20 Dec 2000 20:31:39 -0700 |
Reply-To: |
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
quoted-printable |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Organization: |
L-Soft international, Inc. |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
On Wed, 20 Dec 2000 18:42:58 PST, Peter Rauch <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:
>And, what address is put into the MAIL FROM: field for the actual file
>which is sent "under separate cover" (i.e., the promised message that
>they do not receive)? Just curious --I have no clue as to what the
>problem is (yet).
owner-listname@hostname the normal Return-Path address for list mailings.
>> I sent a GET CURRENT SCLISTS to the Sierra Club LISTSERV, and the
>> file returned was 31K.
>
>Yes. Just to be clear, we've heard about this problem only
>from (some of) our [log in to unmask]
>
>> Could it be that MSN has put a limit on the
>> *size* of messages it accepts? Does this seem to happen only with
>> larger messages? Are you able to send that file to the person
>> complaining from your own address?
>
>These addressees do not receive even very small files. And, yes,
>I can send them the very same (larger) files and they do receive them.
>They also tell me that they regularly receive even much larger files
>with graphics, etc.
a mystery...
Are you using our LSMTP mailer? If so, please try site-specific logging of
email.msn.com to see what is happening in the SMTP transaction. See the
LSMTP-FAQ for more info: http://www.lsoft.com/manuals/lsmtp-faq.stm#2.6
|
|
|