On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 16:25:23 -0400, Bruno Robichaud said:
> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; Boundary="123456789123456789abcd"
>
> --123456789123456789abcd
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
> ' + @BodyTEXT + '
>
> --123456789123456789abcd
> Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
> ' + @BodyHTML + '
>
> --123456789123456789abcd
> Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
> ' + @BodyAOL + '
Gaak. Two *different* text/html bodyparts in a multipart/alternative?
Pray tell, how does the MUA choose which one to display? And is there a
problem with using *one* text/html that's actually standards-compliant
rather than standards-complacent? ;)