 
|
| Sender: |
|
| Date: |
Tue, 22 Dec 2009 11:24:21 -0500 |
| Reply-To: |
|
| Message-ID: |
|
| Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 |
| In-Reply-To: |
|
| MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
| Comments: |
|
On 12/22/2009 11:18, Pete Weiss wrote:
> At 11:16 12/22/2009 Tuesday, Eckard, Steven wrote:
>> If you are the owner/editor, why would you want to edit your own posts?
>
> If I understand, it could be so that if the owner/editor's email were spoofed, this might allow for interception.
>
That's correct. Confirmation on posting will almost completely eliminate forged
postings. I say "almost", because there is the possibility, however slim it
might be, that the individual whose address was forged will complete the
confirmation process.
--
Paul Russell, Senior Systems Administrator
OIT Messaging Services Team
University of Notre Dame
|
|
|
