|
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Thu, 30 Jan 1997 14:26:04 +0100 |
In-Reply-To: |
Message of Wed, 29 Jan 1997 22:46:58 -0500 from LISTSERV
give-and-take forum < [log in to unmask]> |
Reply-To: |
|
On Wed, 29 Jan 1997 22:46:58 -0500 Stan Ryckman <[log in to unmask]>
said:
>The "Return-Path:" header is unfortunately optional (RFC 822), and is
>added by the final transport system,
Yeah, but if you cross-reference misbehaving vacation programs vs systems
that don't provide a return path, you won't find a lot of vacation
programs with that excuse.
>UNIX-style messages/mailboxes will generally be found to contain a
>"From " header at the beginning with this information which, if you can
>get at it, may be useful,
As far as I know, /usr/ucb/vacation invokes itself as a pipe from your
.forward file and has access to this information. It just doesn't use it.
Eric
|
|
|