 
|
| Sender: |
The Revised LISTSERV Distribution List <LSTSRV-L@EB0UB011> |
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
Marc Shannon <MS5U@CMUCCVMA> |
| Date: |
Thu, 21 May 87 15:52:56 EDT |
| In-Reply-To: |
Message of Wed, 20 May 1987 23:02 SET from <ERIC@FRECP11> |
| Reply-To: |
The Revised LISTSERV Distribution List <LSTSRV-L@EB0UB011> |
I prefer the idea of the GET with a FAV entry. It could be recursive,
but a routine with two internal routines (one to requeue, and the other
to do the actual work) would take care of that.
Perhaps I'm over simplifying it like that, but it seems a lot less
worrisome that the GETLISTn mechanism.
--Marc
|
|
|
