Some of the members of the list CSINFO-L@CSEARN are complaining about
the returning non distributed mails from the list ( if there is an error
in delivering mail the returned mail goes also to the author of the mail
not only to the person that was specified in "Errors-to:" key. )
They say that it is because there is not standard header Errors-to.
Although I tried to simulate  such situation but I was not able to do it.
 
I am afraid I have made something wrong in setup of list.
Can you advise me what should I do to avoid such situation?
                                   Thank you very much
                                                      Ingrid Ledererova
Here is the example of such returned mail:
 
 
 
 
 
> Received: from earn.cvut.cz by sun2.fzu.cz with SMTP id AA01188
>   (5.67a8/IDA-1.5 for <[log in to unmask]>); Mon, 3 Jan 1994 12:48:34 +0100
> Received: from fafukhk.faf.cuni.cz by earn.cvut.cz (IBM VM SMTP V2R1) with
 TCP;
>    Mon, 03 Jan 94 12:54:14 MET
> Received: from FAF1.FAF.CUNI.CZ (faf1) by fafukhk.faf.cuni.cz
 (5.67a8/Ultrix4.2a)
>       id AA05776; Mon, 3 Jan 1994 12:51:04 GMT
> Date: Mon, 3 Jan 1994 12:51:04 GMT
> From: [log in to unmask] (Mail Delivery Subsystem)
> Subject: Returned mail: User unknown
> Message-Id: <[log in to unmask]>
> To: [log in to unmask]
> X-Charset: ASCII
> X-Char-Esc: 29
> Status: RO
>
>    ----- Transcript of session follows -----
> While talking to nsfnet-relay.ac.uk:
> >>> RCPT To:<[log in to unmask]>
> <<< 550 Unknown domain 'brad.ac.uk'
> 550 <[log in to unmask]>... User unknown
>
>    ----- Recipients of this delivery -----
> Bounced, cannot deliver:
>    <[log in to unmask]>
>
>    ----- Unsent message follows -----
> Received: from FAF1.FAF.CUNI.CZ (faf1) by fafukhk.faf.cuni.cz
 (5.67a8/Ultrix4.2a)
>       id AA05774; Mon, 3 Jan 1994 12:51:04 GMT
> Received: from FAF1/MAILQUEUE by FAF1.FAF.CUNI.CZ (Mercury 1.11);
>     Mon, 3 Jan 94 12:53:15 +0100 (MET)
> Received: from MAILQUEUE by FAF1 (Mercury 1.11); Mon, 3 Jan 94 12:53:04 +0100
 (MET)
> Received: from FAF1/MAILQUEUE by FAF1.FAF.CUNI.CZ (Mercury 1.11)
>   for <[log in to unmask]>;  Mon, 3 Jan 94 12:53:04 +0100 (MET)
> Resent-From: [log in to unmask]
> Resent-To: [log in to unmask]
> Resent-Date: Mon, 3 Jan 94 12:53:04 +0100 (MET)
> Received: from earn.cvut.cz by FAF1.FAF.CUNI.CZ (Mercury 1.11);
>     Mon, 3 Jan 94 12:52:51 +0100 (MET)
> Received: from EARN.CVUT.CZ by earn.cvut.cz (IBM VM SMTP V2R1)
>    with BSMTP id 8736; Mon, 03 Jan 94 12:49:31 MET
> Received: from EARN.CVUT.CZ (NJE origin LISTSERV@CSEARN) by EARN.CVUT.CZ
 (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 8721; Mon, 3 Jan 1994 12:46:43 +0000
> Date:         Mon, 3 Jan 1994 12:39:56 +0100
> Reply-To: Diskuse o mistnich problemech v siti <[log in to unmask]>
> Sender: Diskuse o mistnich problemech v siti <[log in to unmask]>
> From: Fiala Tomas <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject:      Cena "ULTRA"
> Comments: To: [log in to unmask]
> To: Multiple recipients of list CSINFO-L <[log in to unmask]>
> Message-Id: <[log in to unmask]>
> X-Charset: ASCII
> X-Char-Esc: 29
>
> Jaka je "spravna" cena desky SMC ULTRA ? Mam nabidku od firmy
....